“Every System or Order of Life is a ‘Religion’…”
February 8th, 2009An Excerpt from Sayyid Qutb’s ‘al-Mustaqbal li-hadha al-din’
“Every System or Order of Life is a ‘Religion’…”
“Growth and evolution, being phases of the correlation between the ideological ideal and the social order, may be generalized to comprise principles for a complete system of life which would include man’s emotions, morals, forms of worship, rituals, traditions and every terrestrial human activity. Now, since revealed religion comprises a system of life, it becomes a convincing concept that includes the social order which derives from it to administer all human activities.
We may equally contend that each system of life is a ‘religion’ in the sense that religion functions in society as the philosophical mooring that determines the fiber of life in that society. If the system derives from a Divine ideal, then the society would be adhering to a Divine religion. If it is instituted by the ruler or the tribe or the people (that is, if it derives from a human doctrine, concept of philosophy), then this society would be practicing a ‘ruler’s religion’, or a ‘clan’s religion’ or a ‘people’s religion’. [See: Syed Abul-Ala Maududi's - Four Basic Quranic Terms]
The contemporary exponents of social doctrines, theories and philosophies do not hesitate to express the fact that they formulate creeds to mold the life-styles of people in their own image. In this fashion they substitute for Divine religions their individualistic social, patriotic or national doctrines.
Communism is not a mere social system. It is an ideological ideal, expressed in term of ‘dialectical materialism’, based on the material contradictions which cause world evolution and revolution. This dogma promulgates a purely economic interpretation of history, ascribing all evolutions in human life to the means of production. Therefore, it is not a mere social order; it is a creed that gives rise to (or allegedly leads to) a social order, even though there is conspicuous incongruity between the origin of the theory and the reality of the system derived from it.
Similar is the situation with other systems and orders of life. Their authors call them creeds and speak about ‘our social creed’ or ‘our patriotic belief’ or ‘our national creed’. All such designations express a religious bias. In fact, every system or order of life is a ‘religion’ for that life. The religion of those who live such a life becomes that system which orders their manners of living. If people adopt the system which God has revealed, they would be following God’s religion; if they adopt another system they would be following someone else’s religion. This matter is so obvious that we believe further clarification to be unnecessary.”
[From: Sayyid Qutb's - 'al-Mustaqbal li-hadha al-din', Chapter 2: Religions Are Systems of Life]